Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX (max)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.9. GLM 5.3 FlashX (max) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.623 vs $1.135. GLM 5.3 FlashX (max) is faster at 43.97s vs 114.73s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 78.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
635,288
Response Time (avg)
114.73s
Total Cost
$1.135
Rank
#97
Total Output Tokens
402,765
Response Time (avg)
43.97s
Total Cost
$0.623
Recommended model GLM 5.3 FlashX (max)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 1.8x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.3 FlashX GLM 5.3 FlashX max Release: 2026-09-21
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #96 #97
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 78.3%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 8.104 4.153
Total Cost $1.135 $0.623
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.370 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 288,919 322,894
Output Tokens 17,484 8,010
Reasoning Tokens 617,804 394,755
Response Time (avg) 114.73s 43.97s
Response Time (max) 1026.43s 390.70s
Response Time (total) 2638.74s 1011.29s
Parameters 27B 320B total (18B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

#97 GLM 5.3 FlashX

max
Cost
$0.046
Time
251.3s
Tokens
36,769 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
GLM 5.3 FlashX 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 24.61s 7,317 463 36,503

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair