- Rank
- #144
- Total Output Tokens
- 409,818
- Response Time (avg)
- 45.48s
- Total Cost
- $0.063
Qwen3.7 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium)
Qwen3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.063 vs $0.114. GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium) is faster at 7.37s vs 45.48s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 69.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #150
- Total Output Tokens
- 30,048
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.37s
- Total Cost
- $0.114
Recommended model
GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.2), while responding about 6.2x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high | GLM 5.3 FlashX GLM 5.3 FlashX medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.2 | 7.1 |
| Rank | #144 | #150 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 69.6% |
| Flaky tests | 7 | 8 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.478 | 0.946 |
| Total Cost | $0.063 | $0.114 |
| Input Price | $0.030 / 1M | $0.370 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.130 / 1M | $1.250 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 293,775 | 205,100 |
| Output Tokens | 13,527 | 8,639 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 396,291 | 21,409 |
| Response Time (avg) | 45.48s | 7.37s |
| Response Time (max) | 431.47s | 74.39s |
| Response Time (total) | 1045.97s | 169.54s |
| Parameters | ~35B total (~3B active) | 320B total (18B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#144 Qwen3.7 Flash
high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#150 GLM 5.3 FlashX
medium- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 8.1s
- Tokens
- 1,480 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 135.86s | 177,444 | 1,197 | 38,371 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 74.39s | 120,771 | 922 | 9,693 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.21s | 672 | 713 | 13,968 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 2 | 1.71s | 639 | 343 | 368 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 9.7 | 66.7% | 0 | 58.84s | 7,893 | 503 | 62,350 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 6.37s | 7,317 | 384 | 5,562 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 6.9 | 5.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 231.97s | 88,896 | 9,866 | 203,866 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 2 | 15.97s | 59,549 | 5,920 | 2,786 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.10s | 7,782 | 270 | 10,800 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.74s | 7,149 | 210 | 134 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 34.43s | 780 | 59 | 35,675 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 3.52s | 759 | 38 | 2,005 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 5.1 | 3.4 | 33.3% | 1 | 10.73s | 516 | 120 | 3,898 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 3.4 | 2.2 | 33.3% | 1 | 1.79s | 498 | 135 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.41s | 699 | 97 | 7,838 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.51s | 678 | 72 | 70 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 7.1 | 5.1 | 77.8% | 2 | 10.79s | 696 | 369 | 10,474 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.84s | 672 | 306 | 371 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.72s | 8,193 | 309 | 1,436 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.30s | 6,861 | 231 | 20 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.70s | 204 | 24 | 7,615 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.60s | 207 | 78 | 400 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
MiMo-V2.6-FlashlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumGemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighQwen3.7 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.7 FlashhighGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumClaude Opus 5nonevsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighGemini 2.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighEmber-1lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmedium