Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5

GLM 5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.307. GLM 5 (medium) is faster at 33.54s vs 49.75s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 78.8%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 Flash (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.7), while costing about 7.7x less than GLM 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #52 #49
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 78.8%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.402 1.668
Total Cost $0.041 $0.307
Input Price $0.094 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.188 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 35,224
Output Tokens 14,478 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 102,996
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 435.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#52 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#49 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair