Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code (low) vs GLM 5 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. GLM 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.307 vs $0.681. GLM 5 (medium) is faster at 33.54s vs 65.89s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 78.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#66
Total Output Tokens
212,558
Response Time (avg)
65.89s
Total Cost
$0.681
Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
124,566
Response Time (avg)
33.54s
Total Cost
$0.307
Recommended model GLM 5 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 2.2x less than Seed-2.0-Code (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code low Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #66 #67
Reliability 5.7 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.1
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 78.8%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 5.235 1.668
Total Cost $0.681 $0.307
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,648 35,224
Output Tokens 8,142 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 204,416 102,996
Response Time (avg) 65.89s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 485.92s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 1449.53s 435.99s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 Seed-2.0-Code

low
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.3s
Tokens
0 tok

#67 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 7.0 5.0 77.8% 2 109.70s 7,948 455 55,759
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair