Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.052 vs $0.224. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 41.37s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
370,250
Response Time (avg)
41.37s
Total Cost
$0.052
Rank
#85
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.224
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.8), while costing about 4.3x less than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #91 #85
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 7.8 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 80.3%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.398 2.159
Total Cost $0.052 $0.224
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 116,331 37,199
Output Tokens 12,330 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 357,920 49,500
Response Time (avg) 41.37s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 431.47s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 910.11s 488.94s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#85 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair