Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.178. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 39.77s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Rank
#45
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.178
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.8), while costing about 3.5x less than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #48 #45
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 7.8 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.387 2.159
Total Cost $0.051 $0.178
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.769 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $2.416 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 116,322 37,199
Output Tokens 12,332 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 347,371 49,500
Response Time (avg) 39.77s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 431.47s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 875.01s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#45 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair