Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.338. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is faster at 7.11s vs 39.77s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#46
Total Output Tokens
31,830
Response Time (avg)
7.11s
Total Cost
$0.338
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 6.7x less than GPT-5.6 Terra (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #46 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 72.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.825 0.387
Total Cost $0.338 $0.051
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,175 116,322
Output Tokens 4,878 12,332
Reasoning Tokens 26,952 347,371
Response Time (avg) 7.11s 39.77s
Response Time (max) 41.68s 431.47s
Response Time (total) 156.42s 875.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#46 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Cost
$0.035
Time
16.3s
Tokens
2,418 tok

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair