Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (low)

Qwen3.8 27B (low) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is faster at 6.85s vs 39.11s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#66
Total Output Tokens
30,349
Response Time (avg)
6.85s
Total Cost
$0.262
Rank
#61
Total Output Tokens
169,329
Response Time (avg)
39.11s
Total Cost
N/A
Recommended model GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.9), while responding about 5.7x faster than Qwen3.8 27B (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14
Score 7.8 7.9
Rank #66 #61
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.603 N/A
Total Cost $0.262 N/A
Input Price $1.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $6.000 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 79,184 99,705
Output Tokens 4,878 1,545
Reasoning Tokens 25,471 167,784
Response Time (avg) 6.85s 39.11s
Response Time (max) 41.68s 376.04s
Response Time (total) 150.65s 860.51s
Parameters ~1T total (~60B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Cost
$0.035
Time
16.3s
Tokens
2,418 tok

#61 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
N/A
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair