Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 27B (low) vs Inkling (medium)

Inkling (medium) leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.9. Qwen3.8 27B (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.071 vs $0.383. Inkling (medium) is faster at 15.66s vs 39.11s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 75.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-28

Compared models

Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
169,329
Response Time (avg)
39.11s
Total Cost
~$0.071
Rank
#87
Total Output Tokens
63,842
Response Time (avg)
15.66s
Total Cost
$0.383
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.9 vs 8.0), while costing about 5.4x less than Inkling (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14 Inkling Inkling medium Release: 2026-07-18
Score 7.9 8.0
Rank #93 #87
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 75.8%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result ~0.473 2.551
Total Cost ~$0.071 $0.383
Input Price N/A $1.000 / 1M
Output Price N/A $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 99,705 124,062
Output Tokens 1,545 12,190
Reasoning Tokens 167,784 51,652
Response Time (avg) 39.11s 15.66s
Response Time (max) 376.04s 85.12s
Response Time (total) 860.51s 344.52s
Parameters 27.3B 975B total (41B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#93 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
~$0.003
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

#87 Thinking Machines: Inkling

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
11.2s
Tokens
852 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694
Inkling 8.4 7.8 77.8% 1 25.20s 7,374 525 14,457

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair