Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.060 vs $0.176. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 49.75s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#57
Total Output Tokens
168,165
Response Time (avg)
49.75s
Total Cost
$0.060
Rank
#49
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.176
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 2.9x less than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #57 #49
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.2 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.402 2.159
Total Cost $0.060 $0.176
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.761 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $2.389 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 37,199
Output Tokens 14,478 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 49,500
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 488.94s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#57 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#49 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair