#174 MiMo-V2.5
none- Cost
- $0.007
- Time
- 267.4s
- Tokens
- 25,283 tok
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.1. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.164. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 6.70s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 40.9%.
Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.5), while costing about 6.7x less than GLM 5.1.
Last updated at: 2026-07-21
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.1 | 5.5 |
| Rank | #174 | #157 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 25.8% | 40.9% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 5 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.770 | 2.368 |
| Total Cost | $0.025 | $0.164 |
| Input Price | $0.140 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.280 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 141,043 | 124,209 |
| Output Tokens | 16,464 | 14,393 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 4.62s | 6.70s |
| Response Time (max) | 55.36s | 61.20s |
| Response Time (total) | 101.57s | 147.38s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#157 GLM 5.1
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mistral Small 4mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsGLM 5.1noneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsGLM 5.1noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowvsGLM 5.1noneNemotron 3 SupermediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowvsMiMo-V2.5noneNorth Mini CodemediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1noneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneCobuddymediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneMistral Small 4mediumvsGLM 5.1noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsMiMo-V2.5none