Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.1. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.048. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 8.42s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.6 5.1
Rank #145 #164
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 25.8%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.593 0.770
Total Cost $0.048 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 51,472 141,043
Output Tokens 7,822 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 58,352 0
Response Time (avg) 8.42s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 185.24s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#164 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair