Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Mistral: Mistral Small 4 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.1. GLM 5.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.057 vs $0.068. GLM 5.1 is faster at 4.10s vs 9.40s, with pass rates of 44.4% vs 41.3%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.1It has the best score here (5.6), while responding about 2.3x faster than Mistral Small 4 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 medium Release: 2026-03-16 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.1 5.6
Rank #160 #141
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.9 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 44.4% 41.3%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.344 0.843
Total Cost $0.068 $0.057
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,576 47,133
Output Tokens 24,184 3,754
Reasoning Tokens 84,678 0
Response Time (avg) 9.40s 4.10s
Response Time (max) 59.15s 32.57s
Response Time (total) 197.39s 86.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#160 Mistral Small 4

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
47.9s
Tokens
9,857 tok

#141 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mistral Small 4 4.4 5.1 33.3% 2 39.98s 7,636 11,635 54,715
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair