Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Mistral Small 4 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.096. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 10.77s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#181
Total Output Tokens
131,824
Response Time (avg)
10.77s
Total Cost
$0.096
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 1.6x less than Mistral Small 4 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 medium Release: 2026-03-16 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.1 5.3
Rank #181 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 31.8%
Flaky tests 8 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.913 1.496
Total Cost $0.096 $0.061
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 140,494 93,979
Output Tokens 39,462 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 92,362 0
Response Time (avg) 10.77s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 59.15s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 236.94s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#181 Mistral Small 4

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
47.9s
Tokens
9,857 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mistral Small 4 4.4 5.1 33.3% 2 39.98s 7,636 11,635 54,715
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair