Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Summary

Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2.5 benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2.5 leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.6. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.008. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 2.20s vs 8.58s, with pass rates of 28.6% vs 27.0%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5 - It has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 3.9x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 4.6 4.9
Rank #150 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 28.6% 27.0%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.201 0.413
Total Cost $0.008 $0.007
Input Price $0.110 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 47,250 41,985
Output Tokens 3,319 2,267
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 2.20s
Response Time (max) 81.80s 6.86s
Response Time (total) 128.68s 46.21s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#150 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#143 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.5 8.1 16.7% 1 8.64s 645 1,252 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.5 8.0 16.7% 1 2.19s 645 282 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.28s 20,469 317 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.36s 15,075 330 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 81.80s 7,758 246 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.01s 7,758 366 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 638ms 753 25 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 756ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 6.3 3.4 66.7% 1 1.39s 498 142 0
MiMo-V2.5 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 6.86s 498 81 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 7.49s 684 63 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 751ms 684 72 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.25s 678 671 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 2.13s 678 166 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.64s 8,364 255 0
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 8,238 231 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 399ms 216 12 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.89s 216 16 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair