Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.7. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.032. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5It has the best score here (5.1), while responding about 2.1x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 4.7 5.1
Rank #193 #174
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 25.8%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.793 0.770
Total Cost $0.032 $0.025
Input Price $0.110 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 148,194 141,043
Output Tokens 19,069 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 9.61s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 81.80s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 153.69s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#193 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#174 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair