Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max vs Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo

GLM 5 Turbo (medium) leads on average score with 7.6 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.323. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 23.00s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIts score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.6), while costing about 1.6x less than GLM 5 Turbo (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 GLM 5 Turbo GLM 5 Turbo medium Release: 2026-03-15
Score 7.4 7.6
Rank #67 #56
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.582 2.011
Total Cost $0.197 $0.323
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $4.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,983 35,593
Output Tokens 12,446 12,245
Reasoning Tokens 0 62,277
Response Time (avg) 4.52s 23.00s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 194.23s
Response Time (total) 99.52s 482.97s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#56 GLM 5 Turbo

medium
Cost
$0.074
Time
206.0s
Tokens
18,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
GLM 5 Turbo 8.2 9.3 66.7% 0 45.90s 5,941 363 25,381

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair