Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.115 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 4.61s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.7 Max.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #61 #57
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 68.2%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.884 1.582
Total Cost $0.115 $0.197
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 117,480 95,983
Output Tokens 10,589 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 46,394 0
Response Time (avg) 4.61s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 18.34s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 101.39s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#61 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
5.2s
Tokens
1,944 tok

#57 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.09s 8,126 461 8,597
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair