Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.9. Ling 3.1 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.451. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 7.85s vs 87.39s, with pass rates of 69.6% vs 69.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#105
Total Output Tokens
687,692
Response Time (avg)
87.39s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#101
Total Output Tokens
20,670
Response Time (avg)
7.85s
Total Cost
$0.451
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.9), while responding about 11.1x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash high Release: 2026-10-03 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #105 #101
Reliability 9.8 9.9
Consistency 9.3 10.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.6% 69.6%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 3.070
Total Cost $0.000 $0.451
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.295 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A $1.844 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 324,691 243,553
Output Tokens 181,251 20,670
Reasoning Tokens 506,441 0
Response Time (avg) 87.39s 7.85s
Response Time (max) 665.85s 80.34s
Response Time (total) 2010.08s 180.65s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) ~1T total (~40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#105 Ling 3.1 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
181.1s
Tokens
21,073 tok

#101 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 83.41s 8,298 17,470 54,626
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair