Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.642. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 8.20s, with pass rates of 87.9% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 9.1 7.4
Rank #14 #67
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.7 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 87.9% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.374 1.582
Total Cost $0.642 $0.197
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 69,747 95,983
Output Tokens 2,166 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 57,436 0
Response Time (avg) 8.20s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 76.68s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 180.47s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#14 Gemini 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.201
Time
112.9s
Tokens
22,371 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.9 7.5 77.8% 1 12.63s 8,118 461 24,939
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair