Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.519. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 5.31s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 2.6x less than GPT-5.6 Terra (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra low Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.5 7.4
Rank #53 #57
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 6 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.989 1.582
Total Cost $0.519 $0.197
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,295 95,983
Output Tokens 4,714 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 16,469 0
Response Time (avg) 5.31s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 19.85s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 116.82s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#53 GPT-5.6 Terra

low
Cost
$0.034
Time
16.8s
Tokens
2,348 tok

#57 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 9.56s 7,302 429 6,821
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair