Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.117 vs $0.197. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) is faster at 4.27s vs 4.52s, with pass rates of 62.1% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.7 Max.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite medium Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #62 #57
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 62.1% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.898 1.582
Total Cost $0.117 $0.197
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 104,918 95,983
Output Tokens 9,168 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 51,130 0
Response Time (avg) 4.27s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 26.22s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 94.02s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#62 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
5.3s
Tokens
1,754 tok

#57 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.81s 8,134 459 8,978
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair