Navigate
Advertise here

Kimi K2.7 Code (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.709. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.56s vs 80.09s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#114
Total Output Tokens
239,546
Response Time (avg)
80.09s
Total Cost
$0.709
Rank
#113
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.56s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 3.6x less than Kimi K2.7 Code (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.7 Code Kimi K2.7 Code medium Release: 2026-06-12 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #114 #113
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.0 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.096 1.581
Total Cost $0.709 $0.197
Input Price $0.710 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $3.500 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 72,085 95,992
Output Tokens 57,453 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 182,093 0
Response Time (avg) 80.09s 4.56s
Response Time (max) 365.80s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 1681.85s 100.30s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) ~1T total (~40B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

medium
Cost
$0.025
Time
138.0s
Tokens
6,093 tok

#113 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.7 Code 7.8 9.3 66.7% 0 146.73s 4,650 1,864 25,635
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair