Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.4. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.138 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 13.24s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#62
Total Output Tokens
97,122
Response Time (avg)
13.24s
Total Cost
$0.138
Rank
#68
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.5), while responding about 2.9x faster than GPT-5.4 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano medium Release: 2026-03-17 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.5 7.4
Rank #62 #68
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.5 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.150 1.582
Total Cost $0.138 $0.197
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 82,819 95,983
Output Tokens 7,100 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 90,022 0
Response Time (avg) 13.24s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 94.06s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 291.33s 99.52s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#62 GPT-5.4 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
24.6s
Tokens
4,943 tok

#68 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 19.12s 7,305 516 20,778
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair