Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.4. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.142 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.56s vs 13.32s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#102
Total Output Tokens
99,881
Response Time (avg)
13.32s
Total Cost
$0.142
Rank
#113
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.56s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.5), while responding about 2.9x faster than GPT-5.4 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano medium Release: 2026-03-17 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.5 7.4
Rank #102 #113
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.5 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.179 1.581
Total Cost $0.142 $0.197
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 82,828 95,992
Output Tokens 7,100 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 92,781 0
Response Time (avg) 13.32s 4.56s
Response Time (max) 94.06s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 292.97s 100.30s
Parameters ~120B total (~5B active) ~1T total (~40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 GPT-5.4 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
24.6s
Tokens
4,943 tok

#113 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 19.12s 7,305 516 20,778
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair