Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) leads on average score with 7.6 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.352. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 7.28s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIts score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.6), while costing about 1.8x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna medium Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.6 7.4
Rank #48 #57
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.513 1.582
Total Cost $0.352 $0.197
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,676 95,983
Output Tokens 5,699 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 37,980 0
Response Time (avg) 7.28s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 29.85s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 160.27s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#48 GPT-5.6 Luna

medium
Cost
$0.014
Time
14.6s
Tokens
2,362 tok

#57 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,302 564 9,928
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair