Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.6 (low)

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.449. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.56s vs 14.55s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-24

Compared models

Rank
#129
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.56s
Total Cost
$0.197
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
38,048
Response Time (avg)
14.55s
Total Cost
$0.449
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 2.3x less than Grok 4.6 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 low Release: 2026-08-12
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #129 #135
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 69.7%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.581 2.989
Total Cost $0.197 $0.449
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,992 109,960
Output Tokens 12,446 5,124
Reasoning Tokens 0 32,924
Response Time (avg) 4.56s 14.55s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 26.46s
Response Time (total) 100.30s 320.17s
Parameters ~1T total (~40B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#129 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#135 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
26.0s
Tokens
1,941 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
Grok 4.6 5.5 7.1 44.4% 1 21.69s 9,579 349 7,740

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair