Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.4. Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.024 vs $0.197. Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium) is faster at 3.58s vs 4.56s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-02

Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
127,034
Response Time (avg)
3.58s
Total Cost
$0.024
Rank
#95
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.56s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium)

It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 8.3x less than Qwen3.7 Max.

Detailed comparison

Metric Mercury 2.5 Preview Mercury 2.5 Preview medium Release: 2026-09-02 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.5 7.4
Rank #91 #95
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.158 1.581
Total Cost $0.024 $0.197
Input Price $0.040 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 112,713 95,992
Output Tokens 5,436 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 121,598 0
Response Time (avg) 3.58s 4.56s
Response Time (max) 17.84s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 78.66s 100.30s
Parameters ~100B ~1T total (~40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#91 Mercury 2.5 Preview

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
2.7s
Tokens
2,241 tok

#95 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2.5 Preview 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 3.86s 7,839 552 22,126
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair