Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max vs xAI: Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 (medium) leads on average score with 7.6 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $1.097. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 52.06s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIts score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.6), while costing about 5.6x less than Grok Build 0.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 Grok Build 0.1 Grok Build 0.1 medium Release: 2026-05-21
Score 7.4 7.6
Rank #57 #46
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 63.6%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.582 7.830
Total Cost $0.197 $1.097
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,983 106,751
Output Tokens 12,446 7,993
Reasoning Tokens 0 486,670
Response Time (avg) 4.52s 52.06s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 252.69s
Response Time (total) 99.52s 1145.27s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#57 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#46 xAI: Grok Build 0.1

medium
Cost
$0.028
Time
81.3s
Tokens
14,009 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
Grok Build 0.1 5.7 9.7 33.3% 0 108.46s 8,304 1,138 161,452

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair