Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.478. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 2.4x less than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #60 #59
Reliability 9.8 9.9
Consistency 8.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.978 1.582
Total Cost $0.478 $0.197
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 97,315 95,983
Output Tokens 44,384 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 329,012 0
Response Time (avg) 136.64s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 939.52s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 3006.01s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

#59 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair