Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 4.7. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.032 vs $0.061. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 35B A3BIt has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 1.7x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.3 4.7
Rank #175 #202
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.496 0.793
Total Cost $0.061 $0.032
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,979 148,194
Output Tokens 46,957 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.52s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 39.54s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 110.40s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair