Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.738 vs $0.746. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) is faster at 44.65s vs 58.06s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
740,585
Response Time (avg)
58.06s
Total Cost
$0.746
Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #98 #93
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.712 6.784
Total Cost $0.746 $0.738
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,139 129,041
Output Tokens 61,819 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 678,766 614,312
Response Time (avg) 58.06s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 817.57s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 1161.18s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair