Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.746. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 58.06s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 5.2x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #95 #94
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 60.6%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 5.712
Total Cost $0.145 $0.746
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 85,139
Output Tokens 15,302 61,819
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 678,766
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 58.06s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 1161.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#94 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair