Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.469. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 53.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 3.2x less than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #95 #102
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 8.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 53.0%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 5.202
Total Cost $0.145 $0.469
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 93,357
Output Tokens 15,302 30,466
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 336,325
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 148.73s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 941.66s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 3272.00s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#102 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair