Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

LongCat 2.0 (high) vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.153 vs $0.492. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 153.29s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-03

Rank
#155
Total Output Tokens
386,642
Response Time (avg)
153.29s
Total Cost
$0.492
Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.153
Recommended model GLM 5.2

It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 3.2x less than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #155 #150
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 63.6%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.467 1.312
Total Cost $0.492 $0.153
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,411 112,458
Output Tokens 30,470 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 356,172 0
Response Time (avg) 153.29s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 3372.36s 212.38s
Parameters 1.6T total (48B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#155 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#150 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.8 9.3 66.7% 0 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair