Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.151 vs $0.469. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.34s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 3.1x less than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #97 #96
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 59.1%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 5.202 1.421
Total Cost $0.469 $0.151
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.960 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $3.014 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,357 112,359
Output Tokens 30,466 14,340
Reasoning Tokens 336,325 0
Response Time (avg) 148.73s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 3272.00s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#96 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair