Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $0.300. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 9.65s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
16,454
Response Time (avg)
2.65s
Total Cost
$0.300
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.078
Recommended model GLM 5.2

It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 3.9x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #139 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.302 1.312
Total Cost $0.300 $0.078
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.490 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.540 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,762 112,458
Output Tokens 16,454 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 58.21s 212.38s
Parameters ~500B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#136 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair