Navigate
Advertise here

Solar Pro 4 (low) vs GLM 5.2

Solar Pro 4 (low) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.090 vs $0.130. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 136.11s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-29

Compared models

Rank
#188
Total Output Tokens
338,373
Response Time (avg)
136.11s
Total Cost
$0.130
Rank
#196
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.090
Recommended model GLM 5.2

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.8), while responding about 14.1x faster than Solar Pro 4 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 low Release: 2026-08-11 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.8 6.7
Rank #188 #196
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.394 1.312
Total Cost $0.130 $0.090
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.234 / 1M
Output Price $0.360 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,556 112,458
Output Tokens 6,153 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 332,220 0
Response Time (avg) 136.11s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 640.89s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 2994.49s 212.38s
Parameters ~100B 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#188 Solar Pro 4

low
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#196 GLM 5.2

none
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Solar Pro 4 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 259.63s 6,033 515 76,894
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair