Navigate
Advertise here

GPT 5.3 Chat vs Solar Pro 4 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. Solar Pro 4 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.174 vs $0.533. GPT 5.3 Chat is faster at 6.31s vs 145.21s, with pass rates of 62.3% vs 60.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#182
Total Output Tokens
28,179
Response Time (avg)
6.31s
Total Cost
$0.533
Rank
#178
Total Output Tokens
385,862
Response Time (avg)
145.21s
Total Cost
$0.174
Recommended model GPT 5.3 Chat

It has the best score here (6.7), while responding about 23.0x faster than Solar Pro 4 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT 5.3 Chat GPT 5.3 Chat none Release: 2026-03-03 Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 low Release: 2026-08-11
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #182 #178
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 7.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 62.3% 60.9%
Flaky tests 4 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 4.097 0.791
Total Cost $0.533 $0.174
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.360 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,846 384,974
Output Tokens 28,179 13,946
Reasoning Tokens 0 371,916
Response Time (avg) 6.31s 145.21s
Response Time (max) 18.33s 640.89s
Response Time (total) 138.73s 3339.87s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) ~100B
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#182 GPT 5.3 Chat

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
8.1s
Tokens
634 tok

#178 Solar Pro 4

low
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT 5.3 Chat 5.6 4.7 55.6% 2 10.52s 7,302 6,632 0
Solar Pro 4 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 259.63s 6,033 515 76,894

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair