Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low) vs Qwen3.5-27B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.138. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low) is faster at 2.56s vs 4.77s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#172
Total Output Tokens
38,410
Response Time (avg)
2.56s
Total Cost
$0.138
Rank
#173
Total Output Tokens
24,323
Response Time (avg)
4.77s
Total Cost
$0.058
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 2.4x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #172 #173
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 45.5%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.149 0.678
Total Cost $0.138 $0.058
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 139,165 102,325
Output Tokens 12,899 24,323
Reasoning Tokens 25,511 0
Response Time (avg) 2.56s 4.77s
Response Time (max) 15.14s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 56.32s 105.00s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#172 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
7.5s
Tokens
2,669 tok

#173 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 917ms 8,126 464 0
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair