Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B vs Inkling Small (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.113. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.77s vs 6.30s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 53.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#173
Total Output Tokens
24,323
Response Time (avg)
4.77s
Total Cost
$0.058
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
56,269
Response Time (avg)
6.30s
Total Cost
$0.113
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 1.9x less than Inkling Small (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 Inkling Small Inkling Small medium Release: 2026-08-01
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #173 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 53.0%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.678 1.177
Total Cost $0.058 $0.113
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 102,325 100,255
Output Tokens 24,323 6,422
Reasoning Tokens 0 49,847
Response Time (avg) 4.77s 6.30s
Response Time (max) 69.46s 17.26s
Response Time (total) 105.00s 138.60s
Parameters 27B 276B total (12B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#173 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#175 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
13.4s
Tokens
1,753 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Inkling Small 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 10.49s 7,374 434 13,783

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair