Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low) vs Qwen3.5-27B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.621. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 16.26s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 40.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#118
Total Output Tokens
397,885
Response Time (avg)
16.26s
Total Cost
$0.621
Rank
#116
Total Output Tokens
24,321
Response Time (avg)
4.76s
Total Cost
$0.058
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 10.7x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #118 #116
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 40.9%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.170 0.763
Total Cost $0.621 $0.058
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,224 102,316
Output Tokens 7,759 24,321
Reasoning Tokens 390,126 0
Response Time (avg) 16.26s 4.76s
Response Time (max) 318.02s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 357.64s 104.71s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#118 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.0s
Tokens
1,479 tok

#116 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair