Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-27B benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads on average score with 6.4 vs 5.9. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.028. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 1.68s vs 1.89s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 38.1%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-27B - Its score stays close to the best score here (5.9 vs 6.4), while costing about 1.9x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.4 5.9
Rank #83 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 38.1%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.227 0.249
Total Cost $0.028 $0.015
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,892 44,478
Output Tokens 2,732 3,592
Reasoning Tokens 9,260 0
Response Time (avg) 1.89s 1.68s
Response Time (max) 5.66s 9.39s
Response Time (total) 39.62s 35.25s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#83 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.0s
Tokens
1,479 tok

#109 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 7.3 6.2 75.0% 2 1.84s 500 1,013 1,548
Qwen3.5-27B 4.8 10.0 25.0% 0 788ms 696 267 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.48s 12,870 348 975
Qwen3.5-27B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 9.39s 16,918 1,461 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.44s 7,453 291 697
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.43s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 1.52s 639 15 1,214
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 540ms 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.37s 492 69 438
Qwen3.5-27B 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.51s 522 126 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.52s 619 72 760
Qwen3.5-27B 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.03s 711 69 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.40s 570 210 1,191
Qwen3.5-27B 6.7 7.9 55.6% 1 1.38s 714 683 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.66s 5,457 234 945
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.54s 8,211 303 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.46s 160 9 420
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 599ms 210 10 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair