Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. LongCat 2.0 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $0.746. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) is faster at 58.06s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)It has the best score here (6.7), while responding about 2.6x faster than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.6 6.7
Rank #102 #94
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 60.6%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.202 5.712
Total Cost $0.469 $0.746
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,357 85,139
Output Tokens 30,466 61,819
Reasoning Tokens 336,325 678,766
Response Time (avg) 148.73s 58.06s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 3272.00s 1161.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#94 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair