Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.5. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.779. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 5.4x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.5
Rank #95 #105
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 59.1%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 7.319
Total Cost $0.145 $0.779
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 106,167
Output Tokens 15,302 32,889
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 241,303
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 106.32s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 1085.11s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 2339.12s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#105 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair