Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) vs Qwen3.6 27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.646 vs $0.680. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) is faster at 16.70s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 59.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#114
Total Output Tokens
412,200
Response Time (avg)
16.70s
Total Cost
$0.646
Rank
#109
Total Output Tokens
274,192
Response Time (avg)
106.32s
Total Cost
$0.680
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low)

It has the best score here (6.5), while responding about 6.4x faster than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #114 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 59.1%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.969 7.319
Total Cost $0.646 $0.680
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 110,185 106,167
Output Tokens 14,717 32,889
Reasoning Tokens 397,483 241,303
Response Time (avg) 16.70s 106.32s
Response Time (max) 309.35s 1085.11s
Response Time (total) 367.47s 2339.12s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
3.7s
Tokens
1,203 tok

#109 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 8,138 660 1,060
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair