Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. LongCat 2.0 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.391 vs $0.746. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) is faster at 58.06s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0 (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 1.9x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #96 #94
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 60.6%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.910 5.712
Total Cost $0.391 $0.746
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 85,139
Output Tokens 5,679 61,819
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 678,766
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 58.06s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 1161.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#94 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair