Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

The average score is effectively tied at 7.1 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $1.046. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 64.16s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 50.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 PlusIt has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 9.9x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.1 7.2
Rank #71 #70
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 50.0%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.509 1.014
Total Cost $1.046 $0.106
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $2.080 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,771 98,824
Output Tokens 44,077 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 443,141 0
Response Time (avg) 64.16s 12.09s
Response Time (max) 519.30s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 1411.60s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

#70 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair