Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.506. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.11s vs 22.11s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 54.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-29

Rank
#108
Total Output Tokens
144,359
Response Time (avg)
22.11s
Total Cost
$0.506
Rank
#104
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.11s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 4.8x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #108 #104
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 54.6%
Flaky tests 6 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.599 0.930
Total Cost $0.506 $0.106
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,085 98,833
Output Tokens 9,071 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 135,288 0
Response Time (avg) 22.11s 12.11s
Response Time (max) 199.97s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 486.31s 266.40s
Parameters ~700B total (~72B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#108 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

#104 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair