Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K2.6 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $1.247. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.11s vs 115.89s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 54.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-29

Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
347,519
Response Time (avg)
115.89s
Total Cost
$1.247
Rank
#104
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.11s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 11.8x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #107 #104
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.3 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 54.6%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 10.029 0.930
Total Cost $1.247 $0.106
Input Price $0.950 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $4.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 68,913 98,833
Output Tokens 64,654 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 282,865 0
Response Time (avg) 115.89s 12.11s
Response Time (max) 876.20s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 2433.66s 266.40s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#107 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

#104 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair