Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kimi K2.6 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.831. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 36.80s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#78
Total Output Tokens
391,540
Response Time (avg)
109.98s
Total Cost
$0.831
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 20.1x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #78 #75
Reliability 9.4 9.9
Consistency 8.3 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.821 0.346
Total Cost $0.831 $0.042
Input Price $0.646 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $2.720 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 68,902 92,182
Output Tokens 111,680 14,287
Reasoning Tokens 279,860 282,962
Response Time (avg) 109.98s 36.80s
Response Time (max) 876.20s 394.54s
Response Time (total) 2309.56s 809.54s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#78 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair