Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.3 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 36.80s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#76
Total Output Tokens
16,797
Response Time (avg)
4.91s
Total Cost
$1.166
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 28.2x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.3 7.3
Rank #76 #75
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.2 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 0.346
Total Cost $1.166 $0.042
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 92,182
Output Tokens 16,797 14,287
Reasoning Tokens 0 282,962
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 36.80s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 394.54s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 809.54s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#76 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair