Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.387 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 19.47s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low)It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 3.0x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #63 #59
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 69.7%
Flaky tests 2 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 3.514
Total Cost $1.166 $0.387
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 87,673
Output Tokens 16,797 7,166
Reasoning Tokens 0 101,474
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 19.47s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 209.15s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 428.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#63 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#59 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

low
Cost
$0.016
Time
47.6s
Tokens
5,182 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 24.87s 7,893 402 24,945

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair