Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

The average score is effectively tied at 7.3 vs 7.2. Claude Opus 4.8 has the lower benchmark cost at $1.166 vs $1.222. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 22.4x faster than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.3 7.2
Rank #63 #65
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.2 8.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 9.821
Total Cost $1.166 $1.222
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 68,902
Output Tokens 16,797 111,680
Reasoning Tokens 0 279,860
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 109.98s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 876.20s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 2309.56s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#63 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#65 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair