- Rank
- #145
- Total Output Tokens
- 347,519
- Response Time (avg)
- 115.89s
- Total Cost
- $1.247
Kimi K2.6 (medium) vs GPT-6 Sol
The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.2. GPT-6 Sol has the lower benchmark cost at $0.280 vs $1.247. GPT-6 Sol is faster at 6.84s vs 115.89s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 66.7%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #148
- Total Output Tokens
- 6,696
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.84s
- Total Cost
- $0.280
Recommended model
GPT-6 Sol
It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 4.5x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium | GPT-6 Sol GPT-6 Sol none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Rank | #145 | #148 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 63.6% | 66.7% |
| Flaky tests | 4 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 10.029 | 2.151 |
| Total Cost | $1.247 | $0.280 |
| Input Price | $0.950 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $4.000 / 1M | $10.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 68,913 | 106,332 |
| Output Tokens | 64,654 | 6,696 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 282,865 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 115.89s | 6.84s |
| Response Time (max) | 876.20s | 23.89s |
| Response Time (total) | 2433.66s | 150.43s |
| Parameters | 1T total (32B active) | ~2T total (~150B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#145 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
medium- Cost
- $0.013
- Time
- 103.4s
- Tokens
- 3,620 tok
#148 GPT-6 Sol
none- Cost
- $0.030
- Time
- 31.9s
- Tokens
- 3,055 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
GPT-6 SolnonevsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsKimi K2.6mediumMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsGPT-6 SolnoneGPT-6 SolnonevsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 SolnoneClaude Opus 4.8nonevsKimi K2.6mediumMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsKimi K2.6mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-6 SolnoneGPT-6 SolnonevsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumKimi K2.6mediumvsQwen3.7 PlusnoneKimi K2.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGPT-6 Solnone